Relationship between Self-reported Sleepiness and Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first-choice treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, its real-world effectiveness is often questioned because of usage issues. The relationship between patient sleepiness and PAP usage has been assessed in relatively small and selected populations within the research context. Objectives: To assess the impact of patient-reported sleep outcomes, particularly self-reported sleepiness and its change during therapy, on PAP usage in the real-world setting. Methods: Deidentified data for U.S.-based patients receiving PAP therapy were examined. Eligible patients were registered in the myAir app and provided self-reported sleepiness at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of PAP between November 2019 and April 2020. Results: A total of 95,397 registered patients met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (mean age, 49.6 ± 13.0 yr; 61.6% male). Daytime sleepiness was the most common reason for PAP therapy initiation (57.1% of patients), and 42.2% of all patients had self-reported moderate to severe OSA. Self-reported sleepiness improved with PAP therapy in most patients over the assessment period, with 62.1% of patients reporting "no" or "slight" sleepiness at Day 28. There was a dose-dependent association between improvement in self-reported sleepiness at Day 28 and PAP usage, and this finding was maintained at Day 360. Self-reported sleepiness at Day 28 was associated with achieving U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services compliance at 90 days (approximately 90% for those with no or slight sleepiness vs. <70% for those with residual very or extreme sleepiness); average daily PAP usage over 360 days was ⩾5.0 and ⩽3.7 hours, respectively, for those with no or slight versus very or extreme sleepiness. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of capturing patient-reported outcomes via a digital platform. Patient-reported outcomes appear to be associated with PAP usage, especially self-reported sleepiness and its response to therapy. Capturing patient-reported outcomes using digital solutions during the course of treatment has the potential to enhance patient outcomes by providing actionable insights.

Association between positive airway pressure therapy adherence and health care resource utilization in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes in the United States.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is a complex interplay between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and type 2 diabetes. There are minimal data regarding the effects of treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on outcomes and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with OSA and type 2 diabetes. We investigated the impact of PAP adherence on HCRU and costs in this population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with a cohort of OSA patient from a US administrative claims dataset linked to objective device data (AirView, ResMed Corp., San Diego, California). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential imbalance in baseline covariates between PAP-adherent and -nonadherent patients. Newly diagnosed patients with OSA aged ≥ 18 years with type 2 diabetes were included. PAP adherence was defined as meeting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services compliance criteria in all 8 90-day periods over 2 years. HCRU was based on the number of all-cause doctor visits, emergency room visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and PAP equipment and supplies. RESULTS: In years 1 and 2 of PAP therapy, HCRU was significantly lower in adherent vs nonadherent patients (number/patient for emergency room visits 0.68 ± 1.47 vs 0.99 ± 1.91 [year 1], 0.69 ± 1.43 vs 0.95 ± 1.89 [year 2]; for hospitalizations 0.16 ± 0.58 vs 0.22 ± 0.62 [year 1], 0.15 ± 0.51 vs 0.21 ± 0.74 [year 2]; all P < .001). Changes in estimated total 24-month payments were higher for nonadherent patients ($2,282, 95% confidence interval: $1,368, $3,205). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent use of PAP therapy over 2 years was associated with decreased HCRU in patients with OSA and type 2 diabetes, strongly suggesting a role for screening and treating OSA in type 2 diabetes. CITATION: Sterling KL, Cistulli PA, Linde-Zwirble W, et al. Association between positive airway pressure therapy adherence and health care resource utilization in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes in the United States. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(3):563-571.

Impact of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Adherence on Outcomes in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Rationale: The co-occurrence of obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, termed overlap syndrome, has a poor prognosis. However, data on positive airway pressure (PAP) treatments and their impact on outcomes and costs are lacking. Objectives: This retrospective observational study investigated the effects of PAP on health outcomes, resource usage, and costs in patients with overlap syndrome. Methods: Deidentified adjudicated claims data for patients with overlap syndrome in the United States were linked to objectively measured PAP user data. Patients were considered adherent to PAP therapy if they met Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criteria for eight 90-day timeframes from device setup through 2-year follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to create comparable groups of adherent and nonadherent patients. Healthcare resource usage was based on the number of doctor visits, all-cause emergency room visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and PAP equipment and supplies, and proxy costs were obtained. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 6,810 patients were included (mean age, 60.8 yr; 56% female); 2,328 were nonadherent. Compared with the year before therapy, there were significant reductions in the number of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and severe acute exacerbations during 2 years of PAP therapy in patients who were versus were not adherent (all P < 0.001). This improvement in health status was paralleled by a significant reduction in the associated healthcare costs. Conclusions: PAP usage by patients with overlap syndrome was associated with reduced all-cause hospitalizations and emergency room visits, severe acute exacerbations, and healthcare costs.

Adherence with positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea in developing vs. developed countries: a big data study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Minimal focus has been placed on variations in health care delivery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study compared positive airway pressure usage in developing countries (Brazil and Mexico) vs. a developed country (United States) and investigated the impact of a patient engagement tool (myAir; ResMed, San Diego, CA) on adherence. METHODS: Deidentified data from the AirView database (ResMed) for patients receiving positive airway pressure therapy with wirelessly connected Air10 (AirSense and AirCurve) devices in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States were analyzed. Adherence was defined using US Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria (usage ≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% of nights in the first 90 days). RESULTS: The analysis included 4,181,490 patients (Brazil: 31,672; Mexico 16,934; United States: 4,132,884). CMS adherence over 90 days was slightly lower in Latin America vs. the United States (Brazil: 71.7%; Mexico: 66.4%; United States: 74.0%). Significantly fewer patients were using the patient engagement tool in Brazil (8.1%) and Mexico (2.8%) vs. the United States (26%; both P < .001). Patients registered to use an engagement tool had a higher rate of CMS adherence and were twice as likely to achieve CMS adherence. Average daily usage and days with usage > 4 hours in the first week were the strongest predictors of CMS adherence. Across all countries, > 80% of patients meeting CMS criteria at 3 months were still using positive airway pressure therapy at 1 year, with 1-year adherences rates of > 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term and long-term positive airway pressure adherence rates in Brazil and Mexico were similar to those achieved in the United States. Patients who registered to use an engagement tool consistently had better adherence than those who did not.

Adherence to Positive Airway Therapy After Switching From CPAP to ASV: A Big Data Analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of data regarding adherence trajectories when switching from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to adaptive servoventilation (ASV) in the context of persistent or treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (CSA). This study investigated 90-day adherence rates in patients with sleep apnea based on the type of positive airway pressure (PAP) device used and any switching of PAP modality over time. METHODS: Telemonitoring data were obtained from a United States PAP database. Eligible patients were a 30% random sample who started PAP, plus all who started ASV, from January 1, 2015 to October 2, 2015. All received PAP and had at least one session with usage of 1 hour or more. Adherence and device usage were determined in three groups: started on CPAP and stayed on CPAP (CPAP only); started on ASV and stayed on ASV (ASV only); started on CPAP, switched to ASV (Switch). The United States Medicare definition of adherence was used. RESULTS: The study included 198,890 patients; 189,724 (CPAP only), 8,957 (ASV only) and 209 (Switch). In the Switch group, average apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly on ASV versus CPAP. At 90 days, adherence rates were 73.8% and 73.2% in the CPAP only and ASV only groups. In the Switch group, CPAP adherence was 62.7%, improving to 76.6% after the switch to ASV. Mean device usage at 90 days was 5.27, 5.31, and 5.73 h/d in the CPAP only, ASV only, and Switch groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-emergent or persistent CSA during CPAP reduced therapy adherence, but adherence improved early after switching from CPAP to ASV.